Chango 8-K/A


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________
FORM 8-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
__________________

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 April 24, 2015
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

__________________
THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 __________________

Delaware
001-36384
20-8881738
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
12181 Bluff Creek Drive, 4th Floor
 
 
Los Angeles, CA 90094
 
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 
 
 
(310) 207-0272
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Not applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))






Explanatory Note

On April 27, 2015, The Rubicon Project, Inc. (“Rubicon Project”) filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Original Form 8-K”) reporting that it had closed its acquisition of Chango Inc. (“Chango”). This Form 8-K/A amends the Original Form 8-K to include the historical audited financial statements of Chango and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information required by Items 9.01(a) and 9.01(b) of Form 8-K that were excluded from the Original Form 8-K in reliance on the instructions to such items.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a)    Financial statements of businesses acquired 

The audited consolidated financial statements of Chango as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 are filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference into this Form 8-K/A. The consent of Deloitte LLP, Chango’s independent auditor, is attached as Exhibit 23.1 to this Form 8-K/A.

(b)    Pro forma financial information 

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of Rubicon Project and Chango as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 are furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated by reference into this Form 8-K/A. 

(d)     Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
23.1
 
Consent of Deloitte LLP, Independent Auditor of Chango Inc.
99.1
 
Audited consolidated financial statements of Chango Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.
99.2
 
Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of The Rubicon Project, Inc. and Chango Inc. as of and for the the year ended December 31, 2014.







SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
 
 
 
 
THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.

 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Brian W. Copple
 
 
 
Brian W. Copple
 
 
 
Secretary

Date: July 9, 2015





EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
23.1
 
Consent of Deloitte LLP, Independent Auditor of Chango Inc.
99.1
 
Audited consolidated financial statements of Chango Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.
99.2
 
Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of The Rubicon Project, Inc. and Chango Inc. as of and for the the year ended December 31, 2014.



23.1 - Deloitte Consent



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We consent to the incorporation by reference in The Rubicon Project, Inc.'s Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-204012, 333-201174, and 333-195972) of our report dated July 9, 2015, relating to the financial statements of Chango Inc., which appears in this Current Report on Form 8-K/A of The Rubicon Project, Inc., dated July 9, 2015.

/s/ Deloitte LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
July 9, 2015




99.1 - Chango Audited Financials
Exhibit 99.1





__________________


Chango Inc.


__________________

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the year ended December 31, 2014




































Chango Inc.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


 
 
Independent Auditor's Report
 
 
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statement of Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stockholders' Deficit
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


2


Deloitte LLP
5140 Yonge Street
Suite 1700
Toronto ON M2N 6L7
Canada

Tel: 416-601-6150
Fax: 416-601-6151
www.deloitte.ca
Independent Auditor’s Report

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Chango Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Chango Inc. and its subsidiary (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, statement of convertible preferred stock and common stockholders’ deficit, and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Chango Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ Deloitte LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
July 9, 2015

3




CHANGO INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands of Canadian Dollars, except share amounts)
 
December 31, 2014
ASSETS
 
Current assets:
 
Cash
$
1,195

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $Nil as of December 31, 2014
16,195

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
911

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
18,301

Property and equipment, net
279

Internal use software development costs, net
1,060

Other assets
21

TOTAL ASSETS
$
19,661

LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
Current liabilities:
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
6,876

Debt, current portion
7,608

Other current liabilities
401

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
14,885

Debt, net of current portion
1,055

TOTAL LIABILITIES
15,940

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
 
Class A, B, and B-1 convertible preferred stock, no par value, 9,422,334 shares authorized, 9,422,334 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014; liquidation preference of $11,020 at December 31, 2014
11,020

COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
Common stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized, 3,503,091 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014
280

Additional paid-in capital
415

Accumulated deficit
(7,994)

TOTAL COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(7,299)

TOTAL LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
$
19,661


The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4


CHANGO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands of Canadian Dollars)

 
Year Ended
 
December 31, 2014
Revenue
$
47,737

Expenses:
 
Cost of revenue
28,114

Sales and marketing
13,893

Technology and development
3,783

General and administrative
2,887

Total expenses
48,677

Loss from operations
(940
)
Other (income) expense:
 
Interest expense
216

Other (income) expense, net
(323
)
Total other income, net
(107
)
Loss before income taxes
(833
)
Provision for income taxes
151

Net loss and comprehensive loss
$
(984
)
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

5


 
CHANGO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(In thousands of Canadian Dollars, except share amounts)
 
 
Convertible
Preferred Stock 
 
Common Stock 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
Balance at January 1, 2014
9,422,334

 
$
11,020

 
3,486,946

 
$
236

 
$
207

 
(7,010
)
 
$
(6,567
)
Issuance of common stock

 

 
16,145

 
44

 
(7
)
 

 
37

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 
215

 

 
215

Net loss and comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 
(984
)
 
(984
)
Balance at December 31, 2014
9,422,334

 
$
11,020

 
3,503,091

 
$
280

 
$
415

 
$
(7,994
)
 
$
(7,299
)
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

6


 
CHANGO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of Canadian Dollars)
 
Year Ended
 
December 31, 2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
Net loss
$
(984
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
 
Depreciation and amortization
321

Amortization of debt discount
42

Stock-based compensation
215

Change in deferred taxes
(6
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
Accounts receivable
(4,065
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(275
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
995

Other current liabilities
465

Net cash used in operating activities
(3,292
)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(194
)
Capitalized internal use software development costs
(1,272
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,466
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
Proceeds from credit facility
6,522

Proceeds from issuance of common stock
37

Repayment of long-term debt
(807
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
5,752

INCREASE IN CASH
994

CASH--Beginning of year
201

CASH--End of year
$
1,195

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF OTHER CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
Cash paid for income taxes
$
1

Cash paid for interest
$
334

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

7


CHANGO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1—Nature of Business
Incorporated and headquartered in Ontario, Canada in 2008, Chango Inc. (the “Company”) develops and sells data driven, real-time media targeting products to companies, either directly or through advertising agencies in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries are Canadian dollars and the balances presented in these consolidated financial statements are in Canadian dollars. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, (“GAAP”), and reflect the following significant accounting policies:
Principles of Consolidation
The Company records its investment in subsidiaries using the consolidation method. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiary, Chango USA Inc. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The consolidated financial statement items requiring the use of management estimates are the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation and recoverability of investment tax credits, property and equipment, internal use software development costs, fair value of stock-based compensation, fair valuation of redeemable preferred shares, and the valuation allowance related to deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company uses data and technology to create relevant and timely advertising campaigns that produce customer insights for buyers of advertising. The Company's unique technology delivers automated advertising campaigns that leverage proprietary intent-based data assets and unique profile technology. The Company’s technology processes internet page views through various third-party search engines and combines the information gathered with the contextual information from the content on a website or application’s page to infer demographic needs of the buyer. In addition to the information it gathers from exchanges and marketplaces, the Company uses its technology and information from third-party data providers to identify users whose online behavior has demonstrated some particular intent that matches campaign goals of buyers. The Company targets these users by purchasing impressions directed to them, thereby delivering its buyers’ desired audience, commonly referred to in the industry as audience retargeting and intent marketing, which ascertains the previously manifested intent of a user and then uses that intent to target them for a particular ad campaign.
The Company reports revenue on both a gross and a net basis. In the majority of cases, the Company agrees to fulfill a buyer's advertising campaign in accordance with the goals of the campaign. In these arrangements, generally, contracts with advertisers are for the delivery of the advertisements based on the number of impressions delivered. The Company maintains arrangements with buyers generally through campaign insertion orders, which specify price and volume requests, and the Company generates revenue from buyers of advertising inventory through arrangements in which the Company acts as a principal and therefore reports revenue on a gross basis.
In other cases, the Company allows the buyer to access its bidding technology to fulfill the buyer’s campaign goals. In these cases, the Company does not enter into campaign insertion orders, but rather enters into a master service agreement or a data platform and buying platform agreement with buyers, which give buyers the ability to purchase ad inventory through the Company’s relationships with exchanges and sellers. In these arrangements, the Company is not the principal and therefore reports revenue on a net basis.

8


The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exist, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. For all revenue transactions, the Company considers a signed agreement, a binding insertion order or other binding or signed documentation to be persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Arrangements for the services typically vary. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including the creditworthiness of a buyer and payment and transaction history. The Company’s revenue arrangements do not include multiple deliverables.
The Company also reports revenue in conformity with  ASC 605-45, Principal agent considerations. The determination of whether the Company is the principal or agent, and hence whether to report revenue on a gross basis or on a net basis, requires the Company to evaluate a number of indicators, none of which on its own is presumptive or determinative.
Indicators that an entity is acting as a principal (and thus revenue is reported on a gross basis) that are most relevant to Chango's business include: (i) whether the entity has the primary responsibility (primary obligor) for providing the goods or services to the buyer or for fulfilling the order, (ii) whether the entity has inventory risk before or after the buyer order, (iii) whether the entity has latitude in establishing prices, either directly or indirectly, (iv) whether the entity changes the product or performs part of the service, (v) whether the entity independently selects the seller, (vi) whether the entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications, and (vii) whether the entity bears the buyer’s credit risk for the amount receivable from the buyer.
Indicators that an entity is acting as an agent exist when it does not have exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services. Indicators of net reporting that are most relevant to Chango's business include: (i) whether the entity’s supplier is the primary obligor in the arrangement, (ii) whether the amount the entity earns is fixed, and (iii) whether the entity’s supplier bears the credit risk. One key feature indicating that an entity is acting as an agent is that the amount the entity earns is predetermined, being either a fixed fee per transaction or a stated percentage of the amount billed to the buyer.
The Company has arrangements with buyers in which it delivers a complete advertising solution, which builds brand awareness, acquires new buyers, and retargets site visitors using the Company’s exclusive network of data, algorithms, and machine learning. The Company enters into buyer agreements through discrete binding insertion orders with independently negotiated parameters to work within, which are determined prior to the launch of an advertising campaign. In these arrangements, the Company is responsible for fulfilling the campaign in accordance with the insertion order. Since the Company is the primary obligor and (i) identifies and contracts with third party advertisers, (ii) establishes the selling prices of the advertisements sold, (iii) performs all billing and collection activities including the retention of credit risk, (iv) has latitude in selecting suppliers, (v) negotiates the price it pays to suppliers of inventory, and (v) makes all inventory purchasing decisions, the Company acts as the principal in these arrangements and therefore reports revenue on a gross basis.
The Company also has arrangements in which it provides buyers with self-serve capabilities for real-time buying of inventory, servicing, targeting, re-targeting, and branding. The Company enters into contracts with buyers under which fees earned by the Company are based on a utilization fee that is a percentage of spend through the platform as well as fees for additional features offered through the Company’s solution. The buyer is responsible for setting up advertising campaigns and is responsible for the cost and payment of advertising inventory. Since the Company is not the primary obligor and charges a stated percentage of the amount billed, and thus does not have exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of inventory or the rendering of services, the Company acts as an agent in these arrangements and therefore recognizes revenue on a net basis.

9


Expenses
The Company classifies its expenses into four categories:
Cost of Revenue
The Company’s cost of revenue consists primarily of amounts the Company pays sellers for transactions for which the Company is the principal and reports revenues on a gross basis, data center costs inclusive of bandwidth costs, data vendor costs, third-party advertising inventory validation costs, amortization of internal use software costs, personnel costs, and facilities-related costs. Amounts the Company pays sellers include expenses for advertising impressions the Company purchases from sellers through third-party exchanges generated for transactions for which the Company is the principal. Data vendor and third-party inventory valuation costs consist primarily of costs to augment campaign performance and monitor the Company’s solution. Personnel costs included in cost of revenue include salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, and employee benefit costs, and are primarily attributable to personnel who support the Company’s platform. The Company capitalizes costs associated with software that is developed for internal use and amortizes the costs in cost of revenue over their estimated useful lives.
Sales and Marketing
The Company’s sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including stock-based compensation and the sales bonuses paid to the Company’s sales organization, and marketing expenses such as brand marketing, travel expenses, trade shows and marketing materials, professional services, and to a lesser extent, facilities-related costs and depreciation. The Company’s sales organization focuses on marketing the Company’s solutions to increase the adoption of the solution by existing and new buyers of targeted advertising inventory.
Technology and Development
The Company’s technology and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including stock-based compensation associated with the ongoing development and maintenance of the Company’s solution, and to a lesser extent, facilities-related costs and depreciation. These expenses include costs incurred in the development, implementation, and maintenance of internal use software. Technology and development costs are expensed as incurred, except to the extent that such costs are associated with internal use software development that qualifies for capitalization, which are then recorded as Internal use software development costs, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company amortizes internal use software development costs and amortizes to costs of revenue.
General and Administrative
The Company’s general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including stock-based compensation, associated with the Company’s executive, finance, human resources, and other administrative personnel, as well as accounting and legal professional services fees, facilities-related costs and depreciation, and other corporate related expenses.
Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation expense related to employee stock-based awards is measured and recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards granted. The Company has granted awards to employees that vest based solely on continued service, or service conditions. The fair value of each option award containing service is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For service condition awards, stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of forfeitures, over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally four years.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are accounted for at fair value determined by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company believes that the fair value of the stock options is more reliably measured than the fair value of the services received. The fair value of each non-employee stock-based compensation award is re-measured each period until a commitment date is reached, which is generally the vesting date.

10


Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires the input of subjective assumptions such as the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock, risk‑free interest rates, and the expected dividend yield of the Company’s common stock. The assumptions used in the Company’s valuation models represent management’s best estimates. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
Advertising and Promotion
Advertising and promotion costs are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was approximately $0.1 million.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the net tax effects of the differences between the Company’s consolidated financial statements carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed.
A valuation allowance is used to reduce some or all of the deferred tax assets if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company has established a full valuation allowance to offset its domestic net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realizing future tax benefits from the net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets.
The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to its uncertain tax positions in its income tax provision in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Comprehensive Loss
For the year ended December 31, 2014, comprehensive loss was equal to net loss. Therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive loss has not been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, are unsecured, and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical collection experience and the review in each period of the status of the then-outstanding accounts receivable, while taking into consideration current buyer information, subsequent collection history, and other relevant data. The Company reviews the allowance for doubtful accounts on a quarterly basis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when the Company believes it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 at December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company did not reserve any amounts for doubtful accounts or write off any accounts receivables.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Internal Use Software Development Costs
The Company capitalizes certain internal use software development costs associated with creating and enhancing internally developed software related to the Company’s technology solutions. These costs include personnel and related employee benefits expenses for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to software projects, and external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining the software. Software development costs that do not meet the qualification for capitalization, as further discussed below, are expensed as incurred and recorded in technology and development expenses in the results of operations.

11


Software development activities generally consist of three stages, (i) the planning stage, (ii) the application and infrastructure development stage, and (iii) the post implementation stage. Costs incurred in the planning and post implementation stages of software development, including costs associated with the post-configuration training and repairs and maintenance of the developed technologies, are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes costs associated with software developed for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed, management has authorized further funding for the completion of the project, and it is probable that the project will be completed and perform as intended. Costs incurred in the application and infrastructure development stages, including significant enhancements and upgrades, are capitalized. Capitalization ends once a project is substantially complete and the software and technologies are ready for their intended purpose. Internal use software development costs are amortized using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three years, commencing when the software is ready for its intended use. The straight-line recognition method approximates the manner in which the expected benefit will be derived.
The Company does not transfer ownership of its software, or lease its software, to third parties.
Internal use software development costs are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is recognized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
The Company reviews the amortization method, useful life and residual values at each reporting date. At December 31, 2014, the estimated useful life for internal use software development costs is provided as follows:
 
Years
Internal use software
3
Canadian Investment Tax Credits
Investment tax credits, which are earned as a result of incurring qualifying research and development expenditures, are accounted for using the cost reduction method. Under this method, investment tax credits are treated as a reduction of the relevant asset accounts or of research and development expenses in the period that the credits become available and there is reasonable assurance that they will be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $0.5 million of investment tax credits related to its current year operations, which is included in accounts receivable and netted against cost of revenue and technology expense. The investment tax credit is net of a $0.2 million reserve. The Company also received an additional refund of $0.7 million as a result of a prior period claim which has been netted against cost of revenue and technology and development expense. The claims are subject to audit by the taxation authorities and any adjustments that result will affect the amount of the investment tax credits recovered.
Preferred Shares
Class A, B, and B-1 preferred shares are redeemable at the option of the holder and convertible and have been determined as having features of both liabilities and equity. Subject to certain restrictions, these shares are redeemable at the option of the holder; however they are not required to be classified as debt in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” These shares have been classified as mezzanine debt.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures for fair value measurements of financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The Company has not elected to apply ASC Subtopic 825-10, Fair Value Option. The Fair Value Option gives the Company the irrevocable option to report most financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument by instrument basis, with changes in fair value reported in earnings. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

12


Level 3 - Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions.
The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities consist of those amounts referred to in Note 3.
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash with a financial institution. Balances may exceed the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (“CDIC”) federally insured limits.
Accounts receivable include amounts due from buyers with principal operations primarily in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its buyers.

At December 31, 2014, no buyer accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, no buyer accounted for more than 10% of revenue.
Foreign currency risk
The Company undertakes sales and purchase transactions in foreign currencies. Foreign currency risk arises from fluctuations in the foreign exchange rates, and the degree of volatility of these rates. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ASC 830-10, Foreign Currency Translation, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Assets and liabilities have been translated at period-end exchange rates and related revenue and expenses have been translated at weighted-average exchange rates. Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued new accounting guidance that raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. As of December 31, 2014, the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue it expects to earn from the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new accounting guidance will replace most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The guidance permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company will evaluate the effect, if any, the guidance will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the guidance on its ongoing financial reporting.
In August 2014, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance related to the evaluation of an entity to continue as a going concern. The amendment establishes management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period. The amendment also gives guidance to determine whether to disclose information about relevant conditions and events when there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance is effective as of December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that simplified the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

13


Note 3—Fair Value Measurements
The fair values of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and other current liabilities, approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
The carrying amount of the federal development loan and long-term debt approximates fair value. The fair value is determined using the present value of future cash flows under current financing agreements, based on the Company’s current estimated borrowing rate for loans with similar terms and conditions. The Company classifies the federal development loan as non-recurring and within Level 3 since the discount to fair value took place at inception and the factors used to develop the estimated fair value are unobservable inputs that are not supported by market activity.
Note 4—Property and Equipment
Major classes of property and equipment were as follows:
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
(in thousands)
Purchased software
 
$
4

Computer equipment and network hardware
 
296

Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
 
172

Leasehold improvements
 
53

 
 
$
525

Accumulated depreciation
 
(246
)
 
 
$
279

Depreciation expense on property and equipment totaled $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
There were no impairment charges to property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Note 5—Internal Use Software Development Costs
Internal use software development costs were as follows:
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
(in thousands)
Internal use software development costs, gross
 
$
1,272

Accumulated amortization
 
(212
)
Internal use software development costs, net
 
$
1,060

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company capitalized $1.3 million of internal use software development costs. Amortization expense was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Based on the Company's internal use software development costs at December 31, 2014, estimated amortization expense of $0.4 million, $0.4 million, $0.2 million, is expected to be recognized in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively.
There were no impairment charges to internal use software development costs for the year ended December 31, 2014.

14


Note 6—Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses included the following:
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in thousands)
Accounts payable—seller
$
3,854

Accounts payable—trade
1,358

Accrued employee-related payables
1,664

 
$
6,876

Note 7—Debt
Comerica Debt
On March 27, 2012, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement with Comerica Bank (“2012 Loan Agreement”). The agreement provided a secured revolving line of credit collateralized by the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, as defined in the agreement. Eligible accounts, as amended, excluded accounts in which 25% of the total account had aged over 90 days and in which 25% of the total for specific accounts that had aged over 120 days, and certain other accounts such as governmental and foreign accounts.
The 2012 Loan Agreement was amended and renewed on November 8, 2012 (“2012 Amendment”). The 2012 Amendment raised the borrowing ceiling to $4.5 million, which bears interest for amounts outstanding between prime rate plus 2% and 2.5%, with a maturity date of November 7, 2013.
In addition, the 2012 Amendment added a term loan of up to $2.0 million for the purpose of financing the Company’s working capital needs. The term loan consisted of two tranches, both bore an interest rate for amounts outstanding of prime rate plus 2.0%, one matured in 36 months and the other in 42 months from the 2012 Amendment date with 30 equal monthly payments for each tranche. Equal monthly installment payments began on December 1, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, there was $1.3 million outstanding on the term loan, $0.9 million of which was included in Debt, current portion, and $0.4 million of which was included in Debt, net of current portion on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
On November 18, 2013, the Company further amended the 2012 Loan Agreement. The amendment increased the borrowing limit on the credit facility up to $10.0 million with a revolving maturity date of November 28, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was not required to pay amounts outstanding under the credit facility as the Company was in the process of amending the loan. In March 2015, the 2012 Loan Agreement was amended with a maturity date of April 30, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, the amount withdrawn on the Line of Credit was $6.5 million, which was included in Debt, current portion on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
The 2012 Loan Agreement requires the Company to comply with financial covenants including minimum levels of adjusted tangible net worth, as well as certain affirmative covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of December 31, 2014.
The 2012 Loan Agreement also restricts the Company’s ability to sell assets, make changes to the nature of its business, engage in mergers or acquisitions, create, incur, assume guarantee or prepay any additional indebtedness and encumbrances, pay dividends, make distributions or redeem, retire or repurchase capital stock, directly or indirectly acquire or own or make other investments other than those permitted, engage in transactions with affiliates, and make payments in respect to subordinated debt without the consent of the financial institution.
In addition, the 2012 Loan Agreement includes customary events of defaults, including an event of default in the event a material adverse change occurs. In case of such an event of default, Comerica Bank would be entitled to, among other things, accelerate payment of amounts due under the credit facility and exercise all rights of a secured creditor.
Federal Development Loan
On July 27, 2011, the Company entered into a federal development loan which consists of a non-interest bearing loan from the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (“FEDA”). FEDA has agreed to fund salaries and benefits relating to the development of the Company’s search retargeting products of up to a maximum of $1.0 million. Repayment terms consist of 59 equal monthly installments of principal of $16 thousand which commenced on October 1, 2014.

15


The FEDA loan requires the Company to comply with certain affirmative covenants and also requires written consent before making certain changes, among other things, to the Company’s business, certain management changes and a change of control.
The Company determined that the fair value of this loan, discounted at 5.0%, was $0.8 million at inception. Accretion interest expense of $42 thousand was recognized during the year. As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.8 million outstanding on the FEDA loan, $0.2 million of which was included in Debt, current portion, and $0.6 million of which was included in Debt, net of current portion on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
Future Payments
Future minimum principal repayments related to federal development loan are as follows:
Fiscal Year
Amount
 
(in thousands)
2015
$
158

2016
166

2017
175

2018
183

2019
145

 
$
827

Current portion
(158
)
Total
669


Future minimum principal repayments related to long-term debt are as follows:
Fiscal Year
Amount
 
(in thousands)
2015
$
928

2016
386

 
1,314

Current portion
(928
)
Total
$
386


Included in debt, current portion are amounts withdrawn on the line of credit, FEDA loan and long-term debt of $6.5 million, $0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Note 8—Capitalization
Common stock
During the current year, 16,145 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options for cash proceeds of $44 thousand. In addition, $7 thousand was reallocated from contributed surplus to share capital.
Redeemable Class A preferred stock
Voting Class A preferred stock were issued with a non-cumulative, non-accruing dividend of 8% per annum, redeemable at the option of the holders after the seventh anniversary of the closing at a price equal to the original purchase price plus all declared but unpaid dividends.
During fiscal 2010, the Company issued 3,259,771 shares of Class A preferred stock outstanding for proceeds of $1.4 million with issuance costs of $55 thousand resulting in a net amount of $1.4 million. The stock is redeemable at the option of the holders after the seventh anniversary of the Class B closing date of January 28, 2011.
The Class A preferred stock is convertible into common stock on a one-to-one basis at the option of the holder at any time. The Class A preferred stock will be automatically converted into common stock immediately prior to the closing of a qualified initial public offering or sale of either all of the stock of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company as described in Note 12.

16


Redeemable Class B preferred stock
Voting Class B preferred stock were issued with non-cumulative preferential dividends in the amount of 8% per annum, redeemable at the option of the holder after the seventh anniversary of the closing at a price equal to the original purchase price plus all declared but unpaid dividends.
During fiscal 2011, the Company issued 4,775,282 shares of Class B preferred stock to investors for gross proceeds of $4.3 million with issuance costs of $53 thousand resulting in a net amount of $4.2 million. The stock is redeemable at the option of the holders after the seventh anniversary of the Class B closing date of January 28, 2011.
The Class B preferred stock is convertible into common stock on a one-to-one basis at the option of the holder at any time. The Class B preferred stock will be automatically converted into common stock immediately prior to the closing of a qualified initial public offering or sale of either all of the stock of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company as described in Note 12.
Redeemable Class B-1 preferred stock
Voting Class B-1 preferred stock were issued with non-cumulative preferential dividends in the amount of 8% per annum, redeemable at the option of the holder after the seventh anniversary of the closing at price equal to the original purchase price plus all declared but unpaid dividends.
During fiscal 2012, the Company issued 1,387, 281 shares of Class B-1 preferred stock to investors for gross proceeds of $5.5 million with issuance costs of $47 thousand resulting in a net amount of $5.5 million. The Class B-1 preferred stock is redeemable at the option of the holders after the seventh anniversary of the Class B closing date of January 28, 2011.
The Class B-1 preferred stock is convertible into common stock on a one-to-one basis at the option of the holder at any time. The Class B-1 preferred stock will be automatically converted into common stock immediately prior to the closing of a qualified initial public offering or sale of either all of the stock of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company as described in Note 12.
At December 31, 2014, the Company’s outstanding convertible preferred stock consisted of the following:
 
December 31, 2014
 
Shares
Authorized
 
Shares
Outstanding
 
Carrying
Values
 
Liquidation
Preference
 
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Class A
3,259,771

 
3,259,771

 
$
1,370

 
$
1,370

Class B
4,775,282

 
4,775,282

 
4,197

 
4,197

Class B-1
1,387,281

 
1,387,281

 
5,453

 
5,453

Total
9,422,334

 
9,422,334

 
$
11,020

 
$
11,020

The Company has an outstanding warrant to purchase 21,607 shares of Class B preferred stock. The fair value of the preferred stock warrant is immaterial.
Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Options
The Company has established a stock option plan (the “Plan”) to facilitate ownership of the Company’s common stock by its directors, officers, employees and consultants.
The Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its directors, officers, and employees.
Options are granted under the Plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors at exercise prices determined by the Board of Directors. In general, options granted under the Plan vest over a period of up to four years from the grant date and expire no later than the fifth anniversary of the grant date subject to earlier termination upon the optionee ceasing to be an officer, director or employee of the Company.


17


A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows:
 
Shares Under Option
 
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
 
Weighted- Average Contractual Life
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
1,387,787

 
$
1.52

 
 
 
 
Granted
290,645

 
$
3.17

 
 
 
 
Exercised
(16,145
)
 
$
2.30

 
 
 
 
Canceled
(131,480
)
 
$
3.00

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
1,530,807

 
$
1.70

 
2.54 years
 
$
2,217

Vested and expected to vest December 31, 2014
1,471,374

 
$
1.65

 
2.46 years
 
$
2,192

Exercisable at December 31, 2014
936,481

 
$
1.03

 
1.69 years
 
$
1,969

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $10 thousand.
At December 31, 2014, the Company had unrecognized employee stock-based compensation relating to stock options of approximately $0.7 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.51 years.
The weighted-average grant date per share fair value of stock options granted for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.27.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options that contain service conditions using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average input assumptions used by the Company were as follows:
 
Year Ended
 
December 31, 2014
Expected term (in years)
3.6 years

Risk-free interest rate
1.38
%
Expected volatility
50
%
Dividend yield
%
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the consolidated statements of operations was as follows:
 
Year Ended
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in thousands)
Cost of revenue
$
3

Sales and marketing
138

Technology and development
64

General and administrative
10

Total stock-based compensation
$
215

Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company has commitments under non-cancelable operating leases for facilities and certain equipment, and its managed data center facilities. Total rental expenses were $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

18


As of December 31, 2014 the Company’s non-cancelable minimum operating lease commitments were as follows: 
Fiscal Year
Amount
 
(in thousands)
2015
$
206

2016
26

Total
$
232

Guarantees and Indemnification
The Company’s agreements with sellers, buyers, and other third parties typically obligate it to provide indemnity and defense for losses resulting from claims of intellectual property infringement, damages to property or persons, business losses, or other liabilities. Generally these indemnity and defense obligations relate to the Company’s own business operations, obligations, and acts or omissions. However, under some circumstances, the Company agrees to indemnify and defend contract counterparties against losses resulting from their own business operations, obligations, and acts or omissions, or the business operations, obligations, and acts or omissions of third parties. In addition, the Company’s agreements with sellers, buyers, and other third parties typically include provisions limiting the Company’s liability to the counterparty, and the counterparty’s liability to the Company. These limits sometimes do not apply to certain liabilities, including indemnity obligations. These indemnity and limitation of liability provisions generally survive termination or expiration of the agreements in which they appear. The Company has also entered into indemnification agreements with its directors, executive officers and certain other officers that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. No demands have been made upon the Company to provide indemnification under such agreements and there are no claims that the Company is aware of that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Litigation
From time to time, the Company is party to various litigation and administrative proceedings relating to claims arising from its operations in the normal course of business. Based on the information presently available, including discussion with legal counsel, management believes that resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Employment Contracts
The Company has entered into severance agreements with certain employees and officers. The Company may be required to pay severance and accelerate the vesting of certain equity awards in the event of involuntary terminations as described in Note 12.
Note 11—Income Taxes
The following are the components of the provision for income taxes:
 
 
Year Ended
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
(in thousands)
Current:
 
 
Federal (Canada)
 
$

Provincial (Canada)
 

Foreign (USA)
 
157

Total current provision
 
157

Deferred:
 
 
Federal (Canada)
 

Provincial (Canada)
 

Foreign (USA)

 
(6
)
Total deferred benefit
 
(6
)
Total provision for income taxes
 
$
151



19


Set forth below is a reconciliation of the components that caused the Company’s provision for income taxes to differ from amounts computed by applying the Canadian statutory rate of 26.5% for the year ended December 31, 2014:
 
 
Year Ended
 
 
December 31, 2014
Canadian statutory income tax rate
 
26.5
 %
Foreign income at other than Canadian rates
 
(5.4
)%
Stock-based compensation expense
 
(6.8
)%
Meals and entertainment
 
(7.3
)%
Other permanent items
 
4.4
 %
Valuation
 
(29.5
)%
Effective income tax rate
 
(18.1
)%

Included in prepaid expenses and other, and set forth below are the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to a significant portion of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of the year ended December 31, 2014:

 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets:
 
 
Accrued liabilities
 
$
40

Net operating loss carryovers
 
2,037

Research tax deductions, net
 
441

Other
 
9

Total deferred tax assets
 
2,527

Less valuation allowance
 
(2,177
)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
 
350

Deferred Tax Liabilities:
 
 
Fixed Assets
 
(22
)
Intangible Assets
 
(284
)
Other
 
(27
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
 
(333
)
Net deferred tax assets
 
$
17

The change in valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $0.2 million.
At December 31, 2014, the Company had Canadian net operating loss carryforwards, or “NOLs,” of approximately $7.7 million. Under Canadian tax law, the NOLs will begin to expire starting from tax year 2027. Due to the lack of profit history, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the net deferred tax assets relating to Canadian operations. Due to the NOLs, the Company's Canadian tax returns are open to examination by the Canadian Revenue Agency since inception. The Company's U.S. federal tax returns for tax years 2010 and forward are open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. As of December 31, 2014 there were no uncertain tax positions that require a reserve.
Note 12—Subsequent Events
In April 2015, the Company was acquired by The Rubicon Project, Inc. (“Rubicon Project”) for 4,191,878 shares of Rubicon Project common stock on the date of acquisition.  In addition, if certain performance milestones are achieved, up to an additional $20.6 million U.S. dollars worth of shares of Rubicon Project common stock will be issued to the stockholders of the Company. As part of the acquisition, Rubicon Project assumed the Chango stock option plan.
As part of the purchase consideration for the acquisition, Rubicon Project paid all outstanding debt, including accrued interest, with Comerica Bank and FEDA totaling approximately $9.1 million.

20


The redeemable Class A, B, and B-1 preferred stock described in Note 8 were converted into common stock immediately prior to the sale of the Company. In addition, warrants to purchase preferred stock were exercised and converted to common stock immediately prior to the sale of the Company.
As of July 9, 2015 the Company did not pay any severance subsequent to the sale of the Company. Accelerated vesting of equity awards immediately prior to the sale of the Company totaled $35 thousand.
Aside from the items in the previous paragraphs, the Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through July 9, 2015, the date at which the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.


21
99.2 - Chango combined condensed financial information


Exhibit 99.2

THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

On April 24, 2015 (the “Acquisition Date”), The Rubicon Project, Inc. (the “Company” or “Rubicon Project”), completed its acquisition of Chango Inc. (“Chango”).

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations combine the historical results of operations of the Company and the historical results of operations of Chango for the year ended December 31, 2014 as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2014. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet combines the balance sheets of the Company and Chango as of December 31, 2014 as if the acquisition had occurred on that date.

The unaudited pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the separate consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Company contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 6, 2015, and in conjunction with the separate consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of Chango included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K/A.

The pro forma financial information has been prepared for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been completed at or as of the dates indicated, nor is it indicative of the current or future results of operations or financial position of the combined company. The purchase price allocation presented in these pro forma financial statements is preliminary and is subject to change upon finalization. The pro forma financial information also does not reflect potential realization of operating synergies or costs related to the planned integration, or any actions that have been or may be undertaken by management after the acquisition.

1



  THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014
(In thousands)
 
Historical
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Rubicon Project, Inc.
 
Chango Inc.(1)
 
Pro forma Adjustments
 
 
Pro forma Combined
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
97,196

 
$
1,028

 
$
(10,172
)
(B), (C), (I), (K)
 
$
88,052

Accounts receivable, net
133,267

 
13,926

 
(152
)
(J)
 
147,041

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
7,514

 
783

 

 
 
8,297

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
237,977

 
15,737

 
(10,324
)
 
 
243,390

Property and equipment, net
15,196

 
240

 

 
 
15,436

Internal use software development costs, net
11,501

 
911

 
(911
)
(F)
 
11,501

Goodwill
16,290

 

 
51,819

(A)
 
68,109

Intangible assets, net
14,090

 
18

 
52,402

(A)
 
66,510

Other assets, non-current
1,427

 

 


 
1,427

TOTAL ASSETS
$
296,481

 
$
16,906

 
$
92,986

 
 
$
406,373

LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
151,021

 
$
5,913

 
$
(98
)
(J), (K), (N)
 
$
156,836

Debt and capital lease obligations, current portion
105

 
6,542

 
(6,542
)
(I)
 
105

Other current liabilities
3,276

 
345

 

 
 
3,621

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
154,402

 
12,800

 
(6,640
)
 
 
160,562

Contingent consideration liability
11,448

 

 
16,171

(D)
 
27,619

Debt, non-current portion

 
907

 
(907
)
(I)
 

Other liabilities, non-current
1,879

 

 
12,009

(L), (M)
 
13,888

TOTAL LIABILITIES
167,729

 
13,707

 
20,633

 
 
202,069

Convertible preferred stock

 
9,476

 
(9,476
)
(G)
 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Common stock

 
241

 
(241
)
(H)
 

Additional paid-in capital
209,472

 
357

 
76,254

(E), (H)
 
286,083

Accumulated other comprehensive income
(8)

 

 

 
 
(8
)
Accumulated deficit
(80,712
)
 
(6,875
)
 
5,816

(B), (H)
 
(81,771
)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
128,752

 
(6,277)

 
81,829

 
 
204,304

TOTAL LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
$
296,481

 
$
16,906

 
$
92,986

 
 
$
406,373

(1) Balance has been translated using the Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate of $0.8599 at December 31, 2014.

The accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

2



THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 
Historical
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Rubicon Project, Inc.
 
Chango Inc.(2)
 
Pro forma Adjustments
 
 
Pro forma Combined
Revenue(1)
$
125,295

 
$
43,048

 
$
(483
)
(R)
 
$
167,860

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Cost of revenue
20,754

 
25,374

 
4,900

(O), (R)
 
51,028

Sales and marketing
43,203

 
12,552

 
7,491

(O)
 
63,246

Technology and development
22,718

 
3,426

 
1,125

(O)
 
27,269

General and administrative
57,398

 
2,611

 
1,489

(O)
 
61,498

Total expenses
144,073

 
43,963

 
15,005

 
 
203,041

Loss from operations
(18,778
)
 
(915
)
 
(15,488
)
 
 
(35,181
)
Other (income) expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Interest expense, net
110

 
195

 
(195
)
(Q)
 
110

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities
732

 

 

 
 
732

Foreign exchange (gain), net
(1,119
)
 
(292
)
 

 
 
(1,411
)
Other (income), net

 

 

 
 

Total other (income), net
(277
)
 
(97
)
 
(195
)
 
 
(569
)
Loss before income taxes
(18,501
)
 
(818
)
 
(15,293
)
 
 
(34,612
)
Provision for income taxes
172

 
131

 

 
 
303

Net loss
(18,673
)
 
(949
)
 
(15,293
)
 
 
(34,915
)
Cumulative preferred stock dividends
(1,116
)
 

 

 
 
(1,116
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(19,789
)
 
$
(949
)
 
$
(15,293
)
 
 
$
(36,031
)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
$
(0.70
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(1.13
)
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
28,217

 
 
 
3,553

(P)
 
31,770

(1) Refer to revenue recognition policies included in Note 1.
(2) Balance has been translated using the Canadian dollar to US dollar average daily exchange rate for each corresponding month for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

3



THE RUBICON PROJECT, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

Note 1—Basis of Pro Forma Presentation
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared to illustrate the financial impact of Rubicon Project's acquisition of Chango.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations combine the historical results of operations of the Company and the historical results of operations of Chango for the year ended December 31, 2014 as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2014. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet combines the balance sheets of the Company and Chango as of December 31, 2014 as if the acquisition had occurred on that date.
The balance sheet and statements of operations information for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Rubicon Project has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 6, 2015. The balance sheet and statements of operations information for Chango has been derived from separate financial statements and related notes thereto of Chango included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K/A.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition of Chango using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the Company has allocated the purchase price to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to use significant judgment and estimates including the selection of valuation methodologies, estimates of future revenues and cash flows, discount rates, and selection of comparable companies. The pro forma adjustments are based on preliminary estimates that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Management's purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change pending finalization of the valuation, including finalization of tax attributes and forecast assumptions. The actual purchase price allocation will be subject to the completion of the valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations or the consolidated financial position of the combined company would have been had the acquisition occurred on the dates assumed, nor are they necessarily indicative of current or future consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Revenue Recognition
The majority of Chango’s revenue is reported on a gross basis given the nature of the arrangements and its role as the principal in those arrangements reported on a gross basis and Rubicon Project’s revenue is principally reported on a net basis. Below is Chango’s revenue recognition policy, which should be read in conjunction with the separate financial statements and related notes thereto of Chango included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K/A. The Company’s revenue recognition policies applicable to the year ended December 31, 2014 are described in the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Company contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on March 6, 2015. The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 will include an updated combined revenue recognition policy taking into consideration the integration of Chango.
Chango’s Revenue Recognition Policy
Chango uses data and technology to create relevant and timely advertising campaigns that produce customer insights for buyers of advertising. The Company's unique technology delivers automated advertising campaigns that leverage proprietary intent-based data assets and unique profile technology. Chango’s technology processes internet page views through various third-party search engines and combines the information gathered with the contextual information from the content on a website or application’s page to infer demographic needs of the buyer. In addition to the information it gathers from exchanges and marketplaces, Chango uses its technology and information from third-party data providers to identify users whose online behavior has demonstrated some particular intent that matches campaign goals of buyers. Chango targets these users by purchasing impressions directed to them, thereby delivering its buyers’ desired audience, commonly referred to in the industry as audience retargeting and intent marketing, which ascertains the previously manifested intent of a user and then uses that intent to target them for a particular ad campaign.

4



The Company reports revenue on both a gross and a net basis. In the majority of cases, Chango agrees to fulfill a buyer's advertising campaign in accordance with the goals of the campaign. In these arrangements, generally, contracts with advertisers are for the delivery of the advertisements based on the number of impressions delivered. Chango maintains arrangements with buyers generally through campaign insertion orders, which specify price and volume requests, and Chango generates revenue from buyers of advertising inventory through arrangements in which Chango acts as a principal and therefore reports revenue on a gross basis.
In other cases, Chango allows the buyer to access its bidding technology to fulfill the buyer’s campaign goals. In these cases, Chango does not enter into campaign insertion orders, but rather enters into a master service agreement or a data platform and buying platform agreement with buyers, which give buyers the ability to purchase ad inventory through Chango’s relationships with exchanges and sellers. In these arrangements, Chango is not the principal and therefore reports revenue on a net basis.
Chango recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. For all revenue transactions, Chango considers a signed agreement, a binding insertion order or other binding or signed documentation to be persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Arrangements for the services typically vary. Chango assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including the creditworthiness of a buyer and payment and transaction history. Chango’s revenue arrangements do not include multiple deliverables.
Chango also reports revenue in conformity with ASC 605-45, Principal agent considerations. The determination of whether Chango is the principal or agent, and hence whether to report revenue on a gross basis or on a net basis, requires Chango to evaluate a number of indicators, none of which on its own is presumptive or determinative.
Indicators that an entity is acting as a principal (and thus revenue is reported on a gross basis) that are most relevant to Chango's business include: (i) whether the entity has the primary responsibility (primary obligor) for providing the goods or services to the buyer or for fulfilling the order, (ii) whether the entity has inventory risk before or after the buyer order, (iii) whether the entity has latitude in establishing prices, either directly or indirectly, (iv) whether the entity changes the product or performs part of the service, (v) whether the entity independently selects the seller, (vi) whether the entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications, and (vii) whether the entity bears the buyer’s credit risk for the amount receivable from the buyer.
Indicators that an entity is acting as an agent exist when it does not have exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services. Indicators of net reporting that are most relevant to Chango's business include: (i) whether the entity’s supplier is the primary obligor in the arrangement, (ii) whether the amount the entity earns is fixed, and (iii) whether the entity’s supplier bears the credit risk. One key feature indicating that an entity is acting as an agent is that the amount the entity earns is predetermined, being either a fixed fee per transaction or a stated percentage of the amount billed to the buyer.
Chango has arrangements with buyers in which it delivers a complete advertising solution, which builds brand awareness, acquires new buyers, and retargets site visitors using Chango’s exclusive network of data, algorithms, and machine learning. Chango enters into buyer agreements through discrete binding insertion orders with independently negotiated parameters to work within, which are determined prior to the launch of an advertising campaign. In these arrangements, Chango is responsible for fulfilling the campaign in accordance with the insertion order. Since Chango is the primary obligor and (i) identifies and contracts with third party advertisers, (ii) establishes the selling prices of the advertisements sold, (iii) performs all billing and collection activities including the retention of credit risk, (iv) has latitude in selecting suppliers, (v) negotiates the price it pays to suppliers of inventory, and (v) makes all inventory purchasing decisions, Chango acts as the principal in these arrangements and therefore reports revenue on a gross basis.
Chango also has arrangements in which it provides buyers with self-serve capabilities for real-time buying of inventory, servicing, targeting, re-targeting, and branding. Chango enters into contracts with buyers under which fees earned by Chango are based on a utilization fee that is a percentage of spend through the platform as well as fees for additional features offered through Chango’s solution. The buyer is responsible for setting up advertising campaigns and is responsible for the cost and payment of advertising inventory. Since Chango is not the primary obligor and charges a stated percentage of the amount billed, and thus does not have exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of inventory or the rendering of services, Chango acts as an agent in these arrangements and therefore recognizes revenue on a net basis.

5



Note 2—Purchase Consideration and Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The following table summarizes the total purchase consideration (in thousands):
Shares of Rubicon Project common stock
$
72,477

Fair value of stock-based awards exchanged
4,318

Estimated fair value of contingent consideration
16,171

Cash paid
9,097

Working capital adjustment
(184
)
Total purchase consideration, including estimated contingent consideration
$
101,879


The purchase consideration for the acquisition included 4,191,878 shares of the Company's common stock, with a fair value of approximately $72.5 million, based on the Company's stock price as reported on the NYSE on the Acquisition Date. 639,318 of the 4,191,878 shares of the Company's common stock were placed in escrow to secure post-closing indemnification obligations of the sellers and any shares remaining in escrow after satisfaction of any resolved indemnity claims, less any shares withheld to satisfy pending or resolved claims, will be released from escrow on July 24, 2016. In addition, the Company issued 106,553 shares of the Company's common stock on the date of the acquisition, which were placed in escrow, related to employee future service requirements which were excluded from the purchase consideration and will be expensed in the Company's post acquisition statement of operations. The Company also used approximately $9.1 million of cash to repay Chango's outstanding debt including accrued interest and pay Chango's unpaid transaction expenses.
The purchase consideration also included contingent consideration of up to approximately $20.6 million based upon Chango's performance against certain agreed-upon operating objectives for the year ending December 31, 2015. The Company has the option to pay the contingent consideration in cash or common stock, or a combination thereof. A portion of the contingent consideration shares with a value equivalent to approximately $2.4 million, or 126,098 shares of the Company's stock based on the common stock issuance price pursuant to the purchase agreement were issued and placed in escrow. The remaining number of shares to be issued in connection with the contingent consideration is based on the greater of the volume-weighted-average closing prices of the Company's common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the trading day that is one day prior to December 31, 2015 and $18.77. The fair value was estimated using a Monte-Carlo model as the fair value of the contingent consideration was dependent on both the performance milestones being achieved and the post-acquisition prices of the Company's common stock. The contingent consideration was recorded at an estimated fair value of $16.2 million. The fair value of the contingent consideration provided herein assumed the probability of the performance milestones being achieved and the probability that the Company would settle the contingent consideration in common stock. In accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the contingent consideration has been recorded as a non-current liability in the consolidated balance sheet as the contingent consideration is payable in a variable number of shares at the Acquisition Date. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability post-acquisition will be recorded in the Company's consolidated statement of operations. Subsequent to the Acquisition Date, the operations of Chango were fully integrated into the operations of the Company. Accordingly, pursuant to the acquisition agreement, because the Company will no longer be operating in accordance with the agreed-upon business plan, the entire contingent consideration is deemed earned. As a result, the changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability post-acquisition will primarily be dependent on prices of the Company's common stock for periods subsequent to the Acquisition Date.
As part of the acquisition, existing stock options to purchase common stock of Chango were exchanged for options to purchase the Company's common stock. The fair value of stock options exchanged on the Acquisition Date attributable to pre-acquisition services of approximately $4.3 million has been recorded as purchase consideration. The fair value of stock options exchanged on the Acquisition Date attributable to post-acquisition services of $2.4 million will be recorded as additional stock-based compensation expense on the Company's consolidated statement of operations over their remaining requisite service (vesting) periods.

6



The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation of the acquisition purchase price and the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on preliminary estimates of their respective fair value as December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Cash
$
1,028

Accounts receivable
13,926

Prepaid and other assets
783

Fixed assets
240

Intangible assets
52,420

Goodwill
51,819

Total assets acquired
120,216

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
5,983

Other current liabilities
345

Deferred tax liability, net
12,009

Total liabilities assumed
18,337

Total preliminary purchase price
$
101,879

The preliminary purchase price allocation presented above is derived from Chango's balance sheet as of December 31, 2014.
The Company believes the amount of goodwill resulting from the purchase price allocation is primarily attributable to expected synergies from assembled workforce, an increase in development capabilities, increased offerings to customers, and enhanced opportunities for growth and innovation. Goodwill will not be amortized but instead will be tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if certain indicators of impairment are present. In the event that goodwill has become impaired, the Company will record an expense for the amount impaired during the quarter in which the determination is made. The goodwill generated in the Chango acquisition is not tax deductible.
The following table summarizes the components of the intangible assets and estimated useful lives (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Estimated Useful Life
Technology
$
22,000

3 - 5 years
In-process research and development
580

3 years*
Advertiser relationships
22,000

5 years
Backlog
3,090

<1 year
Non-compete agreements
4,500

2 years
Trademarks
250

<1 year
Total intangible assets acquired
$
52,420

 
* Amortization begins once associated project is completed and it is determined it has alternative future use.
As part of the acquisition, the Company recorded deferred tax liabilities of $13.9 million related to acquired intangible assets net of deferred tax assets of $1.9 million as of December 31, 2014, primarily related to net operating loss carry forwards.
Note 3—Pro Forma Adjustments
The pro forma combined financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are (i) directly attributable to the acquisition, (ii) factually supportable, and (iii) with respect to the statements of operations, expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results of operations. The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited condensed combined financial information are as follows:

A.
To record the intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of $52.4 million, net of Chango's existing intangible assets and the resulting goodwill of $51.8 million.
B.
To record Rubicon Project's transaction costs of $1.1 million as a reduction in cash and an increase in accumulated deficit. No such costs were expensed prior to December 31, 2014.

7



C.
To record Chango's transaction costs of $1.5 million, which were not expensed prior to December 31, 2014, and $0.1 million cash paid to Chango shareholders as a reduction in cash.
D.
To record the fair value of the contingent consideration liability of $16.2 million.
E.
To record the fair value of $72.5 million for the issuance of 4,191,878 shares of Rubicon Project's common stock and the fair value of stock-based awards exchanged of $4.3 million, offset by the working capital adjustment of $0.2 million.
F.
To eliminate the internal use software development costs, net of Chango as the fair value of acquired technology incorporates the fair value of Chango's internal use software development costs (see adjustment A).
G.
To eliminate the convertible preferred stock of Chango.
H.
To eliminate the stockholders' equity (deficit) of Chango.
I.
To record the repayment of Chango debt of $7.4 million immediately prior to the Acquisition Date.
J.
To eliminate the accounts receivable due to Rubicon Project from Chango and the accounts payable due to Chango from Rubicon Project of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2014.
K.
To record the repayment of Chango's accrued interest on its debt immediately prior to the acquisition.
L.
To release the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $1.9 million associated with Chango's deferred tax asset. Release is due to the additional deferred tax liability generated from the inherent basis differences of the associated intangible assets, which is netted against the deferred tax liability (see adjustment M).
M.
To record the deferred tax liability of $13.9 million related to the acquired intangibles.
N.
To accrue for transactions expenses of $0.1 million agreed to be paid but not yet paid as of Acquisition Date.
O.
To record the incremental amortization of preliminary fair value amounts of $15.7 million allocated to intangible assets, net of historical amortization of Chango's internally developed capitalized software, of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The intangible assets are generally amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed, over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of developed technology is included in cost of revenues, the amortization of advertiser relationships and backlog is included in sales and marketing, the amortization of non-compete agreements is included in technology and development and general and administrative, and the amortization of trademarks is included in general and administrative in the accompanying pro forma unaudited condensed combined statement of operations.
P.
To reflect the issuance of 3,552,560 shares of Rubicon Project common stock, net of the 639,318 shares held in escrow to secure post-closing indemnifications, as if they had been issued as of January 1, 2014.
Q.
To reverse the historical interest expense related to the repayment of debt (see adjustment I).
R.
To eliminate the historical transactions of $0.5 million between Chango and Rubicon Project for the year ended December 31, 2014. For a description of the revenue recognition policies of Chango and Rubicon Project, refer to Note 1 and to the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Company contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on March 6, 2015, and in conjunction with the separate financial statements and related notes thereto of Chango included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K/A.

8